DUAN Xiujun,LIU Pei,CHEN Fei,et al.Study on Change Rules of Medicine Properties Caused by Combination of Cold Rhei Radix et Rhizoma and Four Kinds of Hot Chinese Materia Medica[J].zhongguo zhongyiyao xinxi zazhi,2020,27(8):79-85.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-5304.202001182]
寒性药大黄配伍四味不同热性药所致药性变化规律研究
- Title:
- Study on Change Rules of Medicine Properties Caused by Combination of Cold Rhei Radix et Rhizoma and Four Kinds of Hot Chinese Materia Medica
- 文章编号:
- 1005-5304(2020)08-0079-07
- 分类号:
- R285.1
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 目的 通过考察寒性药大黄与热性药附子、肉桂、桂枝、干姜配伍前后的生物热动力学参数变化情况，探究生物热动力学参数与中药寒热性之间关系，以及寒热对药配伍是否具有药性制约作用。方法 采用微量量热仪法，测定并比较大黄与附子、肉桂、桂枝、干姜配伍前后第一指数生长期达峰时间（t1）、达峰发热功率（P1）及生长速率参数（k1），第二指数生长期达峰时间（t2）、达峰发热功率（P2）及生长速率参数（k2），代谢全过程释放总热量（Q总）及代谢总时长（t总）。结果 单味药水提取物测定结果显示，大黄延迟t1，降低k1、P1；除桂枝外其余热性药t1小于大黄，热性药k1、P1均大于大黄；各药均缩短t2，热性药P2均小于大黄，k2、Q总、t总大于大黄。单味药乙醇提取物测定结果显示，除干姜外其余热性药t1、t2均小于大黄；热性药P1、k1、k2均大于大黄，P2小于大黄；除桂枝外其余热性药Q总、t总均大于大黄。寒热对药配伍前后比较，大黄伍附子t1、P1大于单味药，k1、t2、Q总大于大黄、小于附子，P2、k2、t总小于大黄、大于附子；大黄伍肉桂t1、t2大于单味药，P1、k1、Q总、t总大于大黄、小于附子，P2、k2小于大黄、大于附子；大黄伍桂枝t1、t2小于单味药，P1、k1大于等于单味药，P2、k2、Q总小于大黄、大于桂枝，t总大于大黄、小于桂枝；大黄伍干姜t1大于单味药，P1、k1、k2、t2、Q总、t总大于大黄、小于干姜，P2小于大黄、大于干姜。结论 微生物代谢生物热动力学整体状态参数k1、k2、Q总、t总可较好地表征中药的寒热药性，且寒热对药配伍具有明确的药性制约作用。
- Abstract:
- Objective To investigate the relationship between the bio-thermodynamics parameters and the cold-heat property of Chinese materia medica and whether the cold-heat has the restriction effect on the compatibility of medicine by investigating the changes of bio-thermodynamic parameters before and after the compatibility of cold Rhei Radix et Rhizoma with four kinds of hot Chinese materia medica: Aconiti Lateralis Radix Praeparata, Cinnamomi Cortex, Cinnamomi Ramulus, and Zingiberis Rhizoma Recens. Methods Microcalorimetric method was used to investigate the parameters including peak time (t1), peak heating power (P1) and growth rate parameter (k1) in the first exponential growth period, peak time (t2), peak heating power (P2) and growth rate parameter (k2) in the second exponential growth period, total heat released in the whole metabolic process (Qtotal) and total metabolic time (Ttotal) before and after the compatibility of Rhei Radix et Rhizoma with Aconiti Lateralis Radix Praeparata, Cinnamomi Cortex, Cinnamomi Ramulus, and Zingiberis Rhizoma Recens. Results In terms of single medicinal liquid extract, Rhei Radix et Rhizoma delayed t1 and decreased k 1 and P 1. Except for Cinnamomi Ramulus, t1 of other three kinds of hot Chinese materia medica was smaller than Rhei Radix et Rhizoma, and k1 and P 1 of hot Chinese materia medica were larger than Rhei Radix et Rhizoma. Each medicine shortened t 2; P2 of hot Chinese materia medica was less than Rhei Radix et Rhizoma; k2, Qtotal, and ttotal were larger than Rhei Radix et Rhizoma. In terms of single medicinal ethanol extract, except for Zingiberis Rhizoma Recens, t1 and t2 of other hot Chinese materia medica were smaller than Rhei Radix et Rhizoma; P1, k1, and k2 of hot Chinese materia medica were larger than Rhei Radix et Rhizoma, and P2 was smaller than Rhei Radix et Rhizoma. Except for Cinnamomi Ramulus, Q total and ttotal of other three kinds of hot Chinese materia medica were larger than Rhei Radix et Rhizoma. Comparing before and after cold-heat compatibility, t1 and P1 of compatibility of Rhei Radix et Rhizoma and Aconiti Lateralis Radix Praeparata were larger than the single medicine; k1, t2, and Qtotal were larger than Rhei Radix et Rhizoma and smaller than Aconiti Lateralis Radix Praeparata; P2, k2, and ttotal were smaller than Rhei Radix et Rhizoma and larger than Aconiti Lateralis Radix Praeparata. t1 and t 2 of compatibility of Rhei Radix et Rhizoma and Cinnamomi Cortex were larger than the single medicine; P1, k1, Qtotal, and ttotal were larger than Rhei Radix et Rhizoma and smaller than Aconiti Lateralis Radix Praeparata; P2 and k2 were smaller than Rhei Radix et Rhizoma and larger than Aconiti Lateralis Radix Praeparata. t 1 and t 2 of compatibility of Rhei Radix et Rhizoma and Cinnamomi Ramulus were larger than the single medicine; P1 and k1 were larger than the single medicine; P 2, k2, and Qtotal were larger than Rhei Radix et Rhizoma and smaller than Cinnamomi Ramulus; t total was larger than Rhei Radix et Rhizoma and smaller than Cinnamomi Ramulus. t1 of compatibility of Rhei Radix et Rhizoma and Zingiberis Rhizoma Recens was larger than the single medicine; P1, k1, k2, t2, Qtotal, and ttotal were larger than Rhei Radix et Rhizoma and smaller than Zingiberis Rhizoma Recens; P2 was smaller than Rhei Radix et Rhizoma and larger than Zingiberis Rhizoma Recens. Conclusion The overall state parameters k1, k2, Qtotal and T total of microbial metabolism bio-thermodynamics can well characterize the cold-heat property of Chinese materia medica, and the cold-heat has a clear medicinal restriction on TCM compatibility.
参考文献/References:
[1] 柴茂山.中医方剂中寒热并用的配伍形式与临床病证相关性辨析[J].中国中医药科技,2016,23(3)：307-308,317. [2] 聂晶.寒热药相伍的意义探析[J].中国中医基础医学杂志,2015, 21(5)：494,498. [3] 李井彬,陈广,徐丽君,等.乌梅丸及其寒热配伍对２型糖尿病大鼠外周组织AMP蛋白激酶表达的影响[J].中国医院药学杂志,2014,34(9)：724-728. [4] 徐继红,雍定国,耿宝琴,等.左金胶囊与左金丸对抗大鼠实验性胃溃疡及胃酸分泌的比较研究[J].中药药理与临床,1999,15(2)：8-9. [5] 常明向,严劲松,刘小平.香连丸组方抗菌作用研究[J].时珍国医国药,1999,10(1)：7-8. [6] 段秀俊,裴妙荣,裴香萍.酸碱对药大黄与附子在大黄附子汤中配伍的化学研究[J].中国中药杂志,2009,34(17)：2167-2171. [7] 邓雅婷,廖琼峰,毕开顺,等.黄连-吴茱萸药对组分溶出规律的研究[J].中成药,2008,30(6)：900-903. [8] 黎同明.麻黄石膏不同比例配伍麻黄碱、伪麻黄碱的含量变化规律研究[J].新疆中医药,2007,25(增刊)：24-26. [9] 周韶华,潘五九,肖小河,等.中药四性的生物热动力学研究——黄连不同炮制品药性的微量热学比较[J].中草药,2004,35(11)：1230-1232. [10] 周韶华,肖小河,赵艳玲,等.中药四性的生物热动力学研究——左金丸与反左金寒热药性的微量热学比较[J].中国中药杂志,2004,29(12)：1183-1186. [11] 孙晓娇,邹文俊,赵艳玲.基于热动力学表征的“附子无干姜不热”的客观真实性研究[D].成都：成都中医药大学,2014. [12] 杨宇峰,段秀俊.热性药附子、肉桂、吴茱萸、干姜对寒性药黄连中所含盐酸小檗碱提取量的影响[J].中国合理用药探索,2017,14(4)：33- 35. [13] 胥鹏鹏,段秀俊,王嘉琛,等.热性药附子、肉桂、桂枝与干姜对寒性药大黄致泻作用的影响[J].山西中医学院学报,2017,18(1)：10-12. [14] 张小飞,冯玲玲,伍振峰,等.四川产肉桂挥发油化学成分分析及药效学研究[J].中国医药工业杂志,2016,47(9)：1183-1187. [15] 万里江,范正达,唐风雷,等.桂枝挥发油的提取及抗菌试验的考察[J].海峡药学,2008,20(12)：32-34. [16] 梁勤,乔登嫣,马小明,等.甘肃道地中药大黄、黄芩对多重耐药菌的抑菌活性[J].西部中医药,2014,27(5)：5-7. [17] 胡欢,左国营,张泽萍,等.36种中药材体外抗菌活性筛选研究[J].广西植物,2018,38(4)：428-440.
备注/Memo
基金项目：山西省基础研究项目（2013011048-6）
更新日期/Last Update:
2020-07-20